|
Transcendentalists
> Others
in the Circle > Frederick
Douglass > Narrative
> IX
[ Up ] [ Preface - Garrison ] [ Preface - Phillips ] [ Chapter I ] [ Chapter II ] [ Chapter III ] [ Chapter IV ] [ Chapter V ] [ Chapter VI ] [ Chapter VII ] [ Chapter VIII ] [ Chapter IX ] [ Chapter X ] [ Chapter XI ]
from: Narrative of the
Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, written by himself. 1845
Chapter IX
I have now reached a period of my life when I can give dates. I left
Baltimore, and went to live with Master Thomas Auld, at St. Michael's, in March,
1832. It was now more than seven years since I lived with him in the family of
my old master, on Colonel Lloyd's plantation. We of course were now almost
entire strangers to each other. He was to me a new master, and I to him a new
slave. I was ignorant of his temper and disposition; he was equally so of mine.
A very short time, however, brought us into full acquaintance with each other. I
was made acquainted with his wife not less than with himself. They were well
matched, being equally mean and cruel. I was now, for the first time during a
space of more than seven years, made to feel the painful gnawings of hunger--a
something which I had not experienced before since I left Colonel Lloyd's
plantation. It went hard enough with me then, when I could look back to no
period at which I had enjoyed a sufficiency. It was tenfold harder after living
in Master Hugh's family, where I had always had enough to eat, and of that which
was good. I have said Master Thomas was a mean man. He was so. Not to give a
slave enough to eat, is regarded as the most aggravated development of meanness
even among slaveholders. The rule is, no matter how coarse the food, only let
there be enough of it. This is the theory; and in the part of Maryland from
which I came, it is the general practice,--though there are many exceptions.
Master Thomas gave us enough of neither coarse nor fine food. There were four
slaves of us in the kitchen--my sister Eliza, my aunt Priscilla, Henny, and
myself; and we were allowed less than a half of a bushel of corn-meal per week,
and very little else, either in the shape of meat or vegetables. It was not
enough for us to subsist upon. We were therefore reduced to the wretched
necessity of living at the expense of our neighbors. This we did by begging and
stealing, whichever came handy in the time of need, the one being considered as
legitimate as the other. A great many times have we poor creatures been nearly
perishing with hunger, when food in abundance lay mouldering in the safe and
smoke-house, and our pious mistress was aware of the fact; and yet that mistress
and her husband would kneel every morning, and pray that God would bless them in
basket and store!
Bad as all slaveholders are, we seldom meet one destitute of every element of
character commanding respect. My master was one of this rare sort. I do not know
of one single noble act ever performed by him. The leading trait in his
character was meanness; and if there were any other element in his nature, it
was made subject to this. He was mean; and, like most other mean men, he lacked
the ability to conceal his meanness. Captain Auld was not born a slaveholder. He
had been a poor man, master only of a Bay craft. He came into possession of all
his slaves by marriage; and of all men, adopted slave-holders are the worst. He
was cruel, but cowardly. He commanded without firmness. In the enforcement of
his rules, he was at times rigid, and at times lax. At times, he spoke to his
slaves with the firmness of Napoleon and the fury of a demon; at other times, he
might well be mistaken for an inquirer who had lost his way. He did nothing of
himself. He might have passed for a lion, but for his ears. In all things noble
which he attempted, his own meanness shone most conspicuous. His airs, words,
and actions, were the airs, words, and actions of born slave- holders, and,
being assumed, were awkward enough. He was not even a good imitator. He
possessed all the disposition to deceive, but wanted the power. Having no
resources within himself, he was compelled to be the copyist of many, and being
such, he was forever the victim of inconsistency; and of consequence he was an
object of contempt, and was held as such even by his slaves. The luxury of
having slaves of his own to wait upon him was something new and unprepared for.
He was a slaveholder without the ability to hold slaves. He found himself
incapable of managing his slaves either by force, fear, or fraud. We seldom
called him "master;" we generally called him "Captain Auld,"
and were hardly disposed to title him at all. I doubt not that our conduct had
much to do with making him appear awkward, and of consequence fretful. Our want
of reverence for him must have perplexed him greatly. He wished to have us call
him master, but lacked the firmness necessary to command us to do so. His wife
used to insist upon our calling him so, but to no purpose. In August, 1832, my
master attended a Methodist camp-meeting held in the Bay-side, Talbot county,
and there experienced religion. I indulged a faint hope that his conversion
would lead him to emancipate his slaves, and that, if he did not do this, it
would, at any rate, make him more kind and humane. I was disappointed in both
these respects. It neither made him to be humane to his slaves, nor to
emancipate them. If it had any effect on his character, it made him more cruel
and hateful in all his ways; for I believe him to have been a much worse man
after his conversion than before. Prior to his conversion, he relied upon his
own depravity to shield and sustain him in his savage barbarity; but after his
conversion, he found religious sanction and support for his slaveholding
cruelty. He made the greatest pretensions to piety. His house was the house of
prayer. He prayed morning, noon, and night. He very soon distinguished himself
among his brethren, and was soon made a class-leader and exhorter. His activity
in revivals was great, and he proved himself an instrument in the hands of the
church in converting many souls. His house was the preachers' home. They used to
take great pleasure in coming there to put up; for while he starved us, he
stuffed them. We have had three or four preachers there at a time. The names of
those who used to come most frequently while I lived there, were Mr. Storks, Mr.
Ewery, Mr. Humphry, and Mr. Hickey. I have also seen Mr. George Cookman at our
house. We slaves loved Mr. Cookman. We believed him to be a good man. We thought
him instrumental in getting Mr. Samuel Harrison, a very rich slaveholder, to
emancipate his slaves; and by some means got the impression that he was laboring
to effect the emancipation of all the slaves. When he was at our house, we were
sure to be called in to prayers. When the others were there, we were sometimes
called in and sometimes not. Mr. Cookman took more notice of us than either of
the other ministers. He could not come among us without betraying his sympathy
for us, and, stupid as we were, we had the sagacity to see it.
While I lived with my master in St. Michael's, there was a white young man, a
Mr. Wilson, who proposed to keep a Sabbath school for the instruction of such
slaves as might be disposed to learn to read the New Testament. We met but three
times, when Mr. West and Mr. Fairbanks, both class-leaders, with many others,
came upon us with sticks and other missiles, drove us off, and forbade us to
meet again. Thus ended our little Sabbath school in the pious town of St.
Michael's.
I have said my master found religious sanction for his cruelty. As an
example, I will state one of many facts going to prove the charge. I have seen
him tie up a lame young woman, and whip her with a heavy cowskin upon her naked
shoulders, causing the warm red blood to drip; and, in justification of the
bloody deed, he would quote this passage of Scripture--"He that knoweth his
master's will, and doeth it not, shall be beaten with many stripes."
Master would keep this lacerated young woman tied up in this horrid situation
four or five hours at a time. I have known him to tie her up early in the
morning, and whip her before breakfast; leave her, go to his store, return at
dinner, and whip her again, cutting her in the places already made raw with his
cruel lash. The secret of master's cruelty toward "Henny" is found in
the fact of her being almost helpless. When quite a child, she fell into the
fire, and burned herself horribly. Her hands were so burnt that she never got
the use of them. She could do very little but bear heavy burdens. She was to
master a bill of expense; and as he was a mean man, she was a constant offence
to him. He seemed desirous of getting the poor girl out of existence. He gave
her away once to his sister; but, being a poor gift, she was not disposed to
keep her. Finally, my benevolent master, to use his own words, "set her
adrift to take care of herself." Here was a recently-converted man, holding
on upon the mother, and at the same time turning out her helpless child, to
starve and die! Master Thomas was one of the many pious slaveholders who hold
slaves for the very charitable purpose of taking care of them.
My master and myself had quite a number of differences. He found me
unsuitable to his purpose. My city life, he said, had had a very pernicious
effect upon me. It had almost ruined me for every good purpose, and fitted me
for every thing which was bad. One of my greatest faults was that of letting his
horse run away, and go down to his father-in- law's farm, which was about five
miles from St. Michael's. I would then have to go after it. My reason for this
kind of carelessness, or carefulness, was, that I could always get something to
eat when I went there. Master William Hamilton, my master's father-in-law,
always gave his slaves enough to eat. I never left there hungry, no matter how
great the need of my speedy return. Master Thomas at length said he would stand
it no longer. I had lived with him nine months, during which time he had given
me a number of severe whippings, all to no good purpose. He resolved to put me
out, as he said, to be broken; and, for this purpose, he let me for one year to
a man named Edward Covey. Mr. Covey was a poor man, a farm-renter. He rented the
place upon which he lived, as also the hands with which he tilled it. Mr. Covey
had acquired a very high reputation for breaking young slaves, and this
reputation was of immense value to him. It enabled him to get his farm tilled
with much less expense to himself than he could have had it done without such a
reputation. Some slaveholders thought it not much loss to allow Mr. Covey to
have their slaves one year, for the sake of the training to which they were
subjected, without any other compensation. He could hire young help with great
ease, in consequence of this reputation. Added to the natural good qualities of
Mr. Covey, he was a professor of religion--a pious soul--a member and a
class-leader in the Methodist church. All of this added weight to his reputation
as a "nigger-breaker." I was aware of all the facts, having been made
acquainted with them by a young man who had lived there. I nevertheless made the
change gladly; for I was sure of getting enough to eat, which is not the
smallest consideration to a hungry man.
[ Up ] [ Preface - Garrison ] [ Preface - Phillips ] [ Chapter I ] [ Chapter II ] [ Chapter III ] [ Chapter IV ] [ Chapter V ] [ Chapter VI ] [ Chapter VII ] [ Chapter VIII ] [ Chapter IX ] [ Chapter X ] [ Chapter XI ]
|